Thursday, September 26, 2002
Spanish as a Political Tactic
The October Washington Monthly has a lengthy and interesting article on language matters by Liesl Schillinger entitled "Spanish Disquisition Or, how a bookish Gringa learned to stop worrying and love el idioma."
A sample:
The Harvard student who learned Spanish in 1975 often did so to follow Che's motorcycle route on a South American road trip. The girlfriend who accompanied him might have studied French, but she didn't want her boyfriend to think she was a snob, so she took Spanish instead. She wanted to seem like a woman of the people.
Like the girlfriend, today's politicians have found that a Spanish vocabulary is useful for disguising silver-spoon roots and expressing solidarity with the masses. Our president, George W. Bush--who comes from a famously privileged background and had a diplomat-class upbringing--demonstrated this in May at a press conference in Paris, when he scolded an American news reporter for having had the effrontery to ask President Jacques Chirac a question in French. Bush huffed to the crowd, "Very good, the guy memorizes four words, and he plays like he's intercontinental." When the reporter, stunned by the hostility, countered that he knew many more than four words of French, the president's disgust only mounted: "I'm impressed. Que bueno (how great)," he said snidely. He clearly meant it to sting--a not-so-veiled suggestion that the reporter was a member of the effete liberal class that was responsible for all that's wrong with American politics. At his birthday this July in Kennebunkport, Bush wore a baseball cap printed with the words "El jefe" (the chief). The message was clear: French is poncey, show-offy, elitist. But Spanish is all-American.
Schillinger, with an obvious knack for learning languages, also states:
No lesser an authority than Paul Fussell, author of the Bible of the American caste system, Class, told me, "I believe quite sincerely that in 50 years Spanish will be the absolute equal of English as a social and financial and serious alternative to English in this country. America will be bilingual, absolutely. The bright people will be." My fervent hope is that, despite my newfound love of Spanish, the bright people will be trilingual--English, Spanish, and something else, too.
The attitude expressed here appears to be "what I like to do and can do easily, everyone else must also do" and it is not unique to Schillinger. At a meeting on bilingual education held at the Center for Applied Linguistics this week, I met a woman from Iceland who said she spoke eight languages. Guess what she does for a living? That's right -- bilingual education coordinator.
This strikes me as one of the reasons why bilingual education does not work. It was a creation of language mavens and political activists. Each group had its own reasons for pushing immigrant children to maintain the ancestral tongue. But the students now trapped in bilingual education programs who lack a gift for languages are doubly burdened.
Gifted people making education policy for all were the reason for the "new math" of the 1970's: "Addition and subtraction? How dull! Let's talk about sets and number theory." I spent a year in grade school moving colored wooden pieces of various sizes about and learning to derive the principles of mathematics from alien number systems. As the Internet joke making the rounds goes:
Teaching Math in 1950: A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100. His cost of production is 4/5 of the price. What is his profit?
Teaching Math in 1970: A logger exchanges a set "L" of lumber for a set "M" of money. The cardinality of set "M" is 100. Each element is worth one dollar. Make 100 dots representing the elements of the set "M." The set "C", the cost of production contains 20 fewer points than set "M." Represent the set "C" as a subset of set "M" and answer the following question: What is the cardinality of the set "P" of profits?
Bilingual education makes the perfect (learn two or three languages) the enemy of the good (learn English well).
|posted by Jim on 11:25 AM|
Link
. . .
|
. . .
|