English First News and Notes
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Updates on official English and related issues

Tuesday, August 31, 2004
 
Why Are Bush and Kerry Tied?

complains the Washington Monthly's Ezra Klein:

Most of us simply cannot believe that this election can even be close, much less locked in a dead-heat. That's not so much a judgment on Republicans as Bush; it's just impossible to understand how anyone can judge this guy's tenure a success.

Klein's view seems to be both that the American people are stupid and that Republican's work hard to fool them. There may be something else at work, notes Slate's Mickey Kaus:

Zogby has polled undecided voters. They don't like Bush's performance in office (disapproving by a 77-23 margin). But then they were asked "Do you or don't you like John Kerry as a person?" The results? Dislike--52%. Like--16%.

Even though this poll has many weaknesses, it illustrates Kerry's problem. His supporters hate President Bush a lot more than they ever loved John Kerry.

The 2004 election has become a referendum on John Kerry. Kerry backers would do well to stop complaining about the intellect (or lack thereof) of the American people and get back to winning hearts and minds.

|posted by Jim on 6:50 PM| Link
. . .
Monday, August 30, 2004
 
Ruy Teixeira Whistles Past the Graveyard

Ruy Teixeira is a smart fellow who coauthored The Emerging Democratic Majority in 2002. Alas for his thesis, that particular majority has not yet manifested. Now he attempts to prove Kerry supporters need not fear their man's slippage in the polls:

Since the beginning of Kerry's campaign it has been clear that there were a substantial number of veterans, and Vietnam veterans in particular, whose support he would never be able to attract because of his participation in the movement against the Vietnam War. ...

As a result, there was never any realistic possibility that Kerry would hold onto the support of many of these voters, even after his quite effective performance at the Democratic convention. All the Bush campaign needed to do was to make sure that these voters were made aware of Kerry's significant role in the anti-war movement of the early 1970's.

This is what the LA Times poll essentially found.

And those grapes really were sour.

The Democratic Convention dwelt on Kerry's war record to the exclusion of everything else. Granted that their goal was not just to win veteran's votes but to demonstrate that their man would be a capable leader in the war on terror. Now they say there is nothing to worry about as veterans shun the Kerry-Edwards ticket in droves.

Pollsters are good at identifying segments of the electorate that campaigns should seek. They are less capable at calculating the cost of winning those votes. For example, they urge candidates to seek the "Hispanic vote" by promoting bilingual education and amnesty for illegal aliens. The required rhetoric will drive away Reagan Democrats and new immigrant citizens who followed the rules.

"Reporting for duty" Kerry's problem now is that a not unsubstantial number of Democrats backed "peace" candidates Dean and Kucinich during the primaries. A lot of those folks marched against the GOP and the Iraq war in New York yesterday.

The veterans are deserting Kerry. Should he lose a few more points in the polls, the "anybody but Bush" peaceniks may well follow. By trying to please everybody, Senator Kerry may well please no one.

|posted by Jim on 7:20 AM| Link
. . .
Friday, August 27, 2004
 
Is There Really a Hispanic Vote?

Not according to the National Journal, a magazine for political insiders in Washington, D.C.

The U.S. Hispanic population, although about 60 percent Mexican-American, is anything but monolithic. And that makes targeting Hispanic voters -- or potential voters -- very complicated. "There are 10 different buttons that you have to push, depending on the [ethnic] community, the generations in America, the location, et cetera," said Kenneth McClintock, minority leader of the Puerto Rican Senate and a member of the Democratic National Committee. "What appeals politically to Mexican-Americans whose grandparents moved to Boston is very different from a Mexican who just crossed the border, so you have to push the button of each individual community." ...

"When I became chairman of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus [in 1992], I made the mistake of referring to the views of Mexican-Americans on guns," said Rep. Serrano. "I learned that there were significant differences [among Hispanics] on gun control."

The different Hispanic communities have tended to focus chiefly on their own interests. For mainland Puerto Ricans, for example, prime concerns are their island's governance and their own continuing internal clashes over whether to seek statehood. For Cuban-Americans, the overriding priority is their island's future after Castro, who has ruled for 45 years. Haitians worry about the political turmoil on their impoverished island. Mexican-Americans are especially concerned about U.S. border-control policies. Last year, 340 people died trying to cross illegally into this country from Mexico.

|posted by Jim on 7:36 PM| Link
. . .
 
NAACP to Encourage FL Felons to Cast Illegal Votes

Notes the Palm Beach Post :

Civil rights leaders also are targeting felons who have concluded their sentences, many of whom were denied the right to vote in 2000 because they had not received formal clemency from the state. Although the same law technically applies, a list of such registered voters — prepared by the Florida Elections Department under Republican Gov. Jeb Bush — was withdrawn after it was shown to contain many names of black men but not Hispanics, most of whom vote Republican in Florida. That means no list will be waiting at polling places to purge those would-be voters (emphasis added).


"We're going to be advertising on radio and in newspapers letting those people know they can vote," [Linda Johnson, president of the Belle Glade NAACP] said.


|posted by Jim on 7:34 PM| Link
. . .
Tuesday, August 24, 2004
 
Is Investigation of Vote Fraud in Florida "Racist"?

Stuart Buck proves otherwise. Bottom line: 264 absentee ballots were witnessed by consultant Ezzie Thomas in an Orlando, Florida, race which avoided a runoff by 234 votes. There are "42 sworn affidavits alleging that Thomas may have broken, or bent, the law."

Furthermore:

In nearly every case, interviewees said they didn't request an absentee ballot; they just got one in the mail. State law is clear that you don't get an absentee ballot unless you specifically ask for one, by phone or mail.

The Mulvaneys think it's highly suspicious that all those absentee ballots showed up at the same time Thomas did. They suspect that Thomas, who keeps a legal database of information gathered from absentee voters he registers, requested ballots for the voters.

Now Florida officials conducting a reasonable investigation of these matters are being roasted as racists in column after column by the New York Times' Bob Herbert.

The lesson here is that the 2004 election is unlikely to be over on Election Day. The fight is likely just beginning.

|posted by Jim on 4:44 PM| Link
. . .
Monday, August 23, 2004
 
Courage

Morton Blackwell's Leadership Institute teaches many useful lessons, one of which is: "Don't fully trust anyone until he has stuck with a good cause which he saw was losing."

Frontrunning is easy. Standing up for what you believe is right in the face of opposition and near-certain defeat is not.

There was much talk on pro-Kerry blogs and websites this past weekend about how Kerry is courageous while Bush is not. Example: "[H]ad [Bush] been possessed of the moral fiber and sense of duty of, say, John Kerry . . ."

Yet I struggle to recall one instance where Senator Kerry has said about any issue, "I don't care what the polls say. This is what I believe."

The problem with Kerry is that he seems to want to agree with all sides of every issue, e.g. "I voted for it so I could vote against it" on a military spending bill. By contrast, you may disagree with him but you cannot argue that Bush's opposition to embryonic stem cell research is based upon opinion polls.

Kerry's many contradictory positions on the Vietnam War were summarized by tart-tongued Bob Dole on Sunday:

Mr. Dole also sought to put the focus as much on Mr. Kerry's antiwar activities as on his war record, noting testimony Mr. Kerry gave to a Congressional committee in 1971.

"I mean, one day he's saying that we were shooting civilians, cutting off their ears, cutting off their heads, throwing away his medals or his ribbons," Mr. Dole said. "The next day he's standing there, 'I want to be president because I'm a Vietnam veteran.'"

With regard to political impact of the Vietnam issue, Posse Incitatus has it right in his "Kerry damage assessment":

Kerry has baited the trap himself. His constant "Let's talk about Vietnam. Let's compare my record to that of Bush" only makes things worse. ...

[Now Bush can say] "Why are you running on four months in Vietnam. What have you done since you got back?"

Kerry will then be forced to address his Senate record, or turn the topic back to Vietnam. If he includes so much as one reference, it will be Bush who gets to say "Enough about Vietnam already. I thought you wanted to talk about something else."

As far back as Kerry's acceptance speech after the Iowa primary, Kerry's service in Vietnam was held up as THE REASON to vote for the man. Now the ball is back in Bush's court. If the Kerry camp is suffering from its image as wishy-washy, the word that first comes to mind with the Bush administration is arrogant. Kerry agrees with everybody while Bush seemingly listens to no one.

President Bush and his team seem to resent being asked to explain anything to anybody. President Reagan had both the courage of his convictions and the willingness to defend them, in his own handwriting. Team Bush needs to ask for America's vote, not demand it, at next week's GOP convention.

|posted by Jim on 5:31 PM| Link
. . .


. . .